Is the Internet Dying?

Parallel Net Superhighway and Entertainment Caches Coming Soon

© Ann Berkeley

May 4, 2009
Internet Map, Matt Britt
By 2010 the Web will slow and suffer temporary glitches. Planning for high-speed parallel networks and entertainment caches has started. Extra costs for net hogs likely.

As people recently grumbled about gmail glitches on LinkedIn, they had no idea what was likely to hit them next. According to a Nemertes Research report, in 2010 they will suffer disruptions such as Internet slowness and temporary freezing that could cause disruptions in many online businesses. Nemertes analyst Ted Ritter cautions that the net will become such an unreliable entity that it will be useless "for business purposes, such as delivering medical records between hospitals in real time."

Internet Capacity Will Stifle Innovation

Ritter says people expect computers to slow down when the kids get back from school and start playing games, but "by 2012 that traffic jam could last all day long." Information on "The Internet Singularity Delayed: Why Limits in Internet Capacity will Stifle Innovation on the Web" is on the company's website (nemertes.com).

Lightning-Fast Parallel Network and "Caches"

Sunday Times reporter John Harlow reports that "Engineers are already preparing for the worst" and that there are plans for a lightning-fast parallel network and "caches" in which private computer stations would store popular entertainment on local supercomputers rather than send it through the "global backbone." Most likely, the use of the parallel network will come with costs and, perhaps, so will the entertainment "caches." Finally, there's a way to make money out of the (up until now) free Internet.

The increasing number of YouTube users is mostly to blame because, each month, they generate the same amount of traffic as the entire Internet in 2000.

Recession Isn't Helping

And the recession isn't helping. Ritter says the increasing number of people working or job hunting from home and using their computers for bandwidth-hungry video and music websites means that demand could double this year. A recent University of Minnesota study, estimating that Internet use was growing by 60 percent a year, did not take into account plans for greater Internet access in China and India, so who knows?

Upgrade Cables and Supercomputers

In the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom companies are spending billions of dollars a year to upgrade cables and supercomputers to increase capacity. Indeed, fiber optic cables are being installed throughout the world at breakneck speed.

What Constitutes a Net Hog

Needless to say, telephone companies want to recoup such escalating costs by increasing prices for "net hogs" who use more than their share of capacity. This raises interesting questions about what constitutes a net hog and how much capacity individuals should be allocated. Who will decide?

Net Users Are in for a Rough Time

Because of the inherent importance of this story, it appears to be ricocheting around the world: the UK's Sunday Times and Australia's Courier-Mail both broke it on April 27 and Canada's Globe and Mail followed two days later. It will probably travel further via Web feeds.

Net users are in for a rough time starting later this year. There will be slowdowns, brownouts and all manner of unsettling events. Business is doing what it can to safeguard medical and entertainment interests. What will protect everyone else?


The copyright of the article Is the Internet Dying? in International Trade is owned by Ann Berkeley. Permission to republish Is the Internet Dying? in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.


Internet Map, Matt Britt
       


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo

Comments
May 4, 2009 2:36 PM
Guest :
The Internet is not dying! Please note that the Times Online article misquoted and misrepresented a number of things. First, the Internet will not break. The Nemertes report is very clear that the core, fiber and metro layers of the Internet will scale to meet all projected demand. The issue is the edge of the Internet, or the last mile. This is where we project demand could outpace capacity in the next few years. Finally, the Times Online article was referring to our report published in November, 2008! We have yet to decide if there will be a report in 2009. I urge readers to see the report and the FAQ so they can better separate the hype from the reality of our study:

FAQ: http://nemertes.com/internet_infrastructure_study_2009_frequently_asked_que stions_faq

Study: http://www.nemertes.com/studies/internet_interrupted_why_architectural_lim itations_will_fracture_net

Sincerely,
Ted Ritter
Nemertes Research
May 5, 2009 12:17 PM
Guest :
Extra cost is coming for every 'net user, don't kid yourself or your readers. It is a certainty as commerce tries to wqreck the good information channel we once held.

Is the internet dying? Yeah, and no wonder why... initially, careless sites were jamming zipping & swooshing text into Flash animations thus eating a thousand times as much delivered data for the same result as ascii would use, yet they had no regards for the stupidity of their actions and fought for the 'right' to waste what was there. Tomorrow will see them continue their antics, but it won't matter because of the current rise in consumption of video... the commercial mind is made up, as it were.

Caching 'entertainment' locally will only help relieve backbone lag; the local pipes are will still suffer delivery between the consumer and the cache, this field is still growing and thus those pipes will continue to slow.

On a related note, fiber is in my neighborhood, but nobody has it coming into their houses, so I conclude the fiber must be infrastructure. Which infrastructure? Cable? ISP? Dunno. Who owns it? No idea. I know the CEO of the company that installed the exact same fiber, but he can't reveal it's owner. Something tells me the owner is a local cable TV outfit, setting itself up for avoiding obsolescence. Is this happening for others... do you have potential infrastructure but someone is sitting on it?
2 Comments